ANALYSIS OF THE CAUSES OF DISCRIMINATION IN TRANSNATIONAL LABOR: A CASE STUDY OF SOUTHEAST ASIA


Abstract views: 56 / PDF downloads: 12

Authors

  • YUN HAO CHUANG Department of Labor Relations, National Chung Cheng University
  • YONG-JIN HUANG National Taipei University, Graduate Institute of Urban Planning

Keywords:

Transnational Workers, Anti-Discrimination, Globalization, Economic Inequality, Intercultural Adaptation

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of workplace discrimination faced by multinational workers in the context of globalization, utilizing the push-pull theory to analyze its underlying causes. The push-pull theory highlights the interaction between forces that drive workers to leave their home countries (e.g., economic inequality, political instability) and those that attract them to new locations (e.g., better employment opportunities, improved quality of life). Due to globalization, many workers migrate in search of enhanced living conditions and career prospects.In Southeast Asia, discriminatory practices against workers from various countries manifest as biases based on race, gender, and cultural background. These forms of discrimination are evident not only in recruitment processes but also in workplace environments, promotion opportunities, and compensation packages. Through a comprehensive literature review and analysis of international policies, this study reveals how the experiences of transnational workers are shaped by multiple factors, including legal frameworks, social perceptions, corporate culture, classism, and racism.The results indicate that the workplace experiences of multinational workers are profoundly influenced by the policy environment and social culture of the host country. In some nations, labor laws are inadequate to effectively protect the rights of foreign workers, while social prejudices further exacerbate discrimination. Moreover, the corporate culture's emphasis on diversity directly impacts workplace equity for multinational workers.This study suggests that governments and corporations should implement more effective diversity and inclusion policies to enhance workplace equity for multinational workers. Recommended measures include strengthening legal protections, providing orientation training, and fostering supportive communities to encourage understanding and collaboration among workers from diverse backgrounds. Only through these initiatives can true fairness in the workplace and social harmony be achieved.

References

Banks, A. D., & Dracup, K. (2006). Factors associated with prolonged prehospital delay of African Americans with acute myocardial infarction. American Journal of Critical Care, 15(2), 149–157.

Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. The American Economic Review, 94(4), 991-1013.

Cai, M., & Yu M. (1998). Analysis of cross-cultural adaptation of foreign workers in Taiwan. Labor-Management Relations, 7153-185.

Chuang, Y. H., Hsieh, C. N., & Chiu, Y. Y. (2024). A Study on Employment Discriminationamong Caregivers in Indonesia: Focusing on Nationalism. Journal of Sciences & Humanities, 12(4), 18-46. DOI: 10.6535/JSH.202408_12(4).0002

Cobb-Clark, D. A., & Connolly, M. (1997). The worldwide market for skilled migrants: Can Australia compete? International Migration Review, 31, 3.

Fuess, S. M. (2003). Immigration policy and highly skilled workers: The case of Japan. Contemporary Economic Policy, 21, 243-257.

Huang, D.Y. (2022).Discussion on the prohibition of forced labor in global supply chains under free trade. Taiwan Labor Quarterly, 69, 25-33.

International Labour Organization (ILO). (1930). Forced Labour Convention, No. 29. Retrieved from ILO website.

Li, Y.M. (2002). Social Conflict Theory. Taipei: Yangzhi Cultural Enterprise Co., Ltd.

Lin, G.Y. & Yau, X. (2013). Exploring the social construction of patriarchal structure: A case study of Taiwanese new immigrant women. Family Education Bimonthly, 41, 65-79.

Ma, C.J. (2013). Labor strategies under state adjustment: A political-economic analysis of Taiwan’s foreign labor policies. Employment and Labor Relations Quarterly, 3(1), 1-28.

Mahroum, S. (2001). Europe and the immigration of highly skilled labour. International Migration, 39, 27-43.

McDonald, P., & Kippen, R. (2001). Labor supply prospects in 16 developed countries, 2000-2050. Population and Development Review, 27, 1-32.

Shaw, B., Menzies, L., Bernardes, E., Baars, S., Nye, P., & Allen, R. (2016). Ethnicity, gender and social mobility. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7f565140f0b6230268ee28/Ethnicity_gender_and_social_mobility.pdf

Trempe, R., Davis, S., & Kunin, R. (1997). Not just numbers: A Canadian framework for future immigration. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.

Tseng, Y.F. (2004). The national politics of introducing foreign labor. Taiwan Journal of Sociology, (32):1-58.

United Nations General Assembly. (1990). International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families. Retrieved from United Nations Treaty Collection.

Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2009). Discrimination and racial disparities in health: Evidence and needed research. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 32(1):20-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-008-9185-0

Witteveen, D., & Attewell, P. (2020). Reconsidering the meritocratic power of a college degree. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 66, 100479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100479

Yen-Fen, Tseng (2006). Who can open the door to borders? Classism in immigration policy. Taiwan Social Research Quarterly, 61,73-107. https://doi.org/10.29816/TARQSS.200603.0002

Downloads

Published

2024-12-26

How to Cite

CHUANG, Y. H., & HUANG, Y.-J. (2024). ANALYSIS OF THE CAUSES OF DISCRIMINATION IN TRANSNATIONAL LABOR: A CASE STUDY OF SOUTHEAST ASIA. Scientific and Academic Research, 3(2), 254–267. Retrieved from https://e-scar.com/index.php/pub/article/view/40